Saturday, December 24, 2005

Big brother is watching you...

The Arvizos have no friends as their own so called friends gave them away...

Just kiddin




Anonymous Shadow said...

Ain't truth stranger than fiction?

This poor molested child and his family actually prefered to go by the last name "JACKSON" instead of keeping their own name or choosing something else. C'mon, They're supposedly in the "witness protection" program. They could have chosen any name they wanted to. Instead, They made it clear they wanted to be known as "The Jacksons"

No. Don't tell me it's because of Jay Jackson that they use that name. Even HE could have changed his name since we rabid and crazy MJ fans go after these people all the time. I guess if one can't be a part of Michael Jackson and his family in reality, They can make up their own fantasy Jacksons.

What's next? Janut naming another kid she has by Jay Tito?

These people are pathetic.

6:32 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

hey, they'd better lay offa toriano! i'd laugh forever if they named this one christian...oooh the irony!

7:08 PM  
Blogger Shadow said...

They'll probably name it Michael. We know they want to. What a sick sick SICK obsession these people have!!! lol

7:12 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...


please note that we don't want anyone to actually go out and hurt this family.

all we're interested in is for people to know the truth and for those associated w/ these people to know they're grifters and they'll use them!

so shaddup, dumb dumb diddy diamond!

7:15 PM  
Blogger Shadow said...

Please listen. I would hate to see innocent MJ fans end up behind bars because of this loser family.

So, Don't go out and do anything stupid,Kids. If you do wind up held against your will...

Well, There's always the hot air balloon to escape with. lol

7:32 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

If the fans wanted to harm this pathetic pack of losers they would have, like with Jordan Chandler, Jason Francia, the fans know where the Arvizos live. Nothing will happen to these losers.

7:41 PM  
Anonymous Shadow said...

Anton has a very valid point. We're so 'crazy". Yet, These leeches are still walking around,Aren't they? I haven't heard of any attacks against them. Oh yeah, except the vague supposed "threats" they claim were made against them. They lie about everything else so Why should I believe them on THAT issue? They need serious help. Unfortunately, Most people who need help with their psychological problems don't get it. They go around making everybody crazy.

3:50 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

don't u just love the sweet smell of karma? it's almost like it's our job to torment the arvisos. they soooo had it coming.

12:33 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

again, this blog isn't to torment anyone. even to bring them pain. it's just to let them, as well as everyone else, that we're not taking their lies lying down.

they will be exposed for the liars they are and if that's hurting them, then it should b/c they've hurt so many others.

those who have nothing to hide don't need to PLEAD THE FIFTH!

2:27 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

okay, losal, i know but i love messing with people who can't defend themselves with facts because they're so used to lying.
Ain't it great that we're used to honesty? TRUTH PREVALES.

3:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course it's meant to torment MJ's accuser. You're just afraid to admit it.

Keep this in mind:

Has anyone ever been held liable in the United States for encouraging acts of violence on the World Wide Web?
Yes. In 1999, a coalition of groups opposed to abortion was ordered to pay over $100 million in damages for providing information for a Web site called "Nuremberg Files," a site which posed a threat to the safety of a number of doctors and clinic workers who perform abortions. The site posted photos of abortion providers, their home addresses, license plate numbers, and the names of their spouses and children. In three instances, after a doctor listed on the site was murdered, a line was drawn through his name. Although the site fell short of explicitly calling for an assault on doctors, the jury found that the information it contained amounted to a real threat of bodily harm.


4:28 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

so know this is a "hate crime"? whatever,dude.

4:33 PM  
Blogger KC said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

4:43 PM  
Anonymous Shadow said...

I think Anonymous was trying to leave a veiled threat. Is that what you were trying to do? Too bad it FAILED.

Where were you when all the journalists in the world were calling Michael Jackson a pedophile and a pervert? Where were you when all these hater sites came up calling Michael Jackson every name in the book and worse? I didn't hear ANYBODY screaming anything about rights or prosecution then. So Give it a rest. If Anton JACKSON was so bothered about privacy and security, He wouldn't have put up his web site for the world to see.

But, Someone comes along.. saw it and decided to present the FACTS in the courtroom as they happened and you haters now wanna scream PRIVACY??

Where was Michael Jackson's privacy when this TEEN decided to accuse him? Hell no, You vultures don't wanna think that maybe he had the right to be INNOCENT until proven GUILTY.

So spare us.

4:49 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

it's so hateful when we comment on the arvizos but when michael is mistreated its perfectly fine right? i don't know why these stupid anonymous posters keep coming back. can they just deal with reality and see michael is innocentb and the people after him are scumbags?

4:58 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

wow,i guess we'd be liable for something except we're not encouraging violence.

in fact, we discourage it. only morons fight w/ fists. the true genius can get it out w/ words...obviously like you aren't...what's ur real name?

so unless we start posting street names and social security numbers, i don't see how ur point is valid.

anyone can find these people. going to this blog isn't gonna give them essential info to reach them.



7:11 PM  
Anonymous Shadow said...

In my first statement, When I said
"Even HE could have changed his name since we rabid and crazy MJ fans go after these people all the time. " I meant it sarcastically. There is not ONE MJ FAN who has been reported to have harassed this family. Not One. And I don't consider putting up court documents as an "act of violence." against the "Jacksons"

These court documents are a part of public record. A freakin' WEB SITE is available for the public to see,which Anton did freely before anybody did.

Also, There's something I love TO POINT OUT CALLED THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. Journalists LOVE to (ab)use it.

It was meant for everybody. Including the people who put up this blog of facts that the haters just can't stand.

Too bad for them.

8:52 PM  
Blogger 7littleangel said...

satire is only way to tell the truth in country of Totalitarian mode ,I know what I talking about ,I lived at Soviet Union

Arvizos,miserable but very harmful criminals and liars are the respectful ,PROTECTED BY LAW citizens of USA - sorry but who is Michael Jackson and what about his rights?-person who must be the pride of own country,who make the positive image of USA all over the world,WHO SPREAD NOTHINFG BUT IDEAS OF PEACE AND LOVE BY HIS ART AND CHARITY
it is known THERE ARE NO PROPHETS IN THE FATHERLAND and if we look at history many of outstanding persons were forced to leave motherland by regime,public opinion etc.and it seems that it is dangerous for Micahel to return to own home WHILE TOM SNEDDONS ARE PROSECUTORS AND ARVIZOS -PROTECTED BY LAW CRIMINALS

6:39 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

yes it is unsafe for mike to return to his home. specially now.... neverland's been invaded more times that the afganistan/pakistan border-and that's a FACT! put your pants on people, the truth is knocking at your door!!!!

10:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'll bet if someone made a fake blog with your real life info you would be bitching about it to hell and back, ReQ. You're such an ignorant fucking nutjob of a coward.

3:36 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

^^^ says ANONYMOUS!


8:24 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I've never falsely accused anybody of a crime, so you can go head and make a blog about me.

3:14 PM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

"Shadow said...
They'll probably name it Michael. We know they want to. What a sick sick SICK obsession these people have!!! lol"

The truly SICK obsession is had by the 45-year-old "man" who thinks he needs to have 12-year-olds boys "sharing" his bed.

8:37 AM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

"pyt in nyc said...
don't u just love the sweet smell of karma? it's almost like it's our job to torment the arvisos. they soooo had it coming."

They "soooo" had it coming? Nice sentence structure, nitwit. Do you know how to capitalize?

Speaking of karma, who will have to sell Neverland to avoid welching on another debt? LOL!

8:40 AM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

"losal23 said...

those who have nothing to hide don't need to PLEAD THE FIFTH!"

Why did Wacko do just that in the wrongful dismissal case?

You can't have two sets of standards here. The same standards to which you want to hold the Arvizos are the standards to which you need to hold your idol.

Don't fear fairness, OK?

8:42 AM  
Blogger losal23 said...

did mike have his lawyer proclaim that he'd talk about that case and explain it like sneddon did in his opening statement?

if the case is about wrongful dismissal and it's referring to the fab five, it has nothing to do w/ the case. theyweren't fired for what they say they saw, they were fired before the mess got big.

9:51 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

you need to lay off the pot, anti-jacko. where did you hear mike was selling neverland? from that asshole roger friedman? people have been talking about him being broke for years but i don't see michael falsely accusing others so he can get monry to pay off his so called "debt"

9:58 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Blog Top Sites