Sunday, December 18, 2005

An invitation...

I am inviting this person to prove their position, and I will prove mine. If this person after reading every document about the case can DEBUNK EVERYTHING that has been said about this family on this blog, I will reveal my identity.


Blogger pyt in nyc said...

godspeed my friend

3:06 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I am not afraid to prove my point and defend my right and our words on this blog. I am ready to go as far as I can to defend what is said on this blog.

3:10 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

Don't hold your breath. lol. You're more likely to see them fly to the moon with imaginary wings, than "debunk everything" Arvizo scam related. lol.

3:12 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

lol you guys. where are these morons hiding?

3:16 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

3:21 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I hope they started reading the court documents. And that's why they're not here.

3:22 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

You're assuming they can read??!! lol.

3:25 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

yes they are illiterate and semi retarded. i'm sure

3:32 PM  
Blogger bestMJfan said...

This is my answer to your invitation.

This is NOT about whether Gavin is telling the truth or if MJ is telling the truth. This is about YOU, an adult, going after a CHILD with the sole purpose of making his life miserable. The only person who has a beef with Gavin is MJ. It's their fight, not your fight.
You fight dirty but you can't take it in return. You didn't like it when I posted personal info about you but you think you have a right to do that to Gavin. You justify it by saying you know for a FACT that Gavin lied about MJ and people should know this. You demand that I give you PROOF that Gavin didn't lie. The only proof you will accept is that I was standing next to you while we witnessed MJ molesting Gavin. In return, that's the only kind of proof I'll take from you that Gavin wasn't molested. I wasn't there so I don't know for a fact that Gavin WAS molested. You weren't there and you do not know for a fact that this kid WASN'T molested. So, don't say you know without a doubt that this kid is lying. And, you go full steam ahead, doing what you can to ruin a 16 year old kid's life based on this?

Going with your logic, why shouldn't I go after you the same way you're going after Gavin? I think you're trying to ruin his life and I think people should know this. They should also know that you're hiding your identity, so why shouldn't I reveal whatever I can about you? You did that to Gavin and you think it's okay. It's okay for me to do it to you, right?

It's not right for either of us but if you're not going to leave this fight between MJ and Gavin, and you're going to bring in others, then I'm going to level the playing field a little.

I used to be a HUGE MJ fan but I'm old enough to see that there is not a perfect human being on this planet, and I'm smart enough to believe that MJ is human and not a god. I'm mad at MJ because he told the world that he was pure, loving, wouldn't hurt a child. He told us many things that weren't true and I think you're smart enough to know this. When I saw him for what he really is, I got angry because he betrayed us. When the day comes that you finally see the truth, you're going to be a lot madder than I am.

These are my last words to you. Go and live in peace and maybe you'll find the wisdom some where to rethink your values and what's really important to your life.

PS to the rest of the fans here: thanks for barking on cue, you guys are so easy to manipulate. No wonder you're MJ fans.

4:20 PM  
Blogger Anton's Evil Twin said...

I just heard a fly drop off the wall with a huge bang. But thanx for sharing your story about your life before you hit the ground. You'll be remembered.

4:24 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

4:32 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I stand by my invitation. And the whole family ACCUSED MJ, not just Gavin, their accusations were inter-connected and corraborated each other. Honey, I read the transcripts. This wasn't Gavin vs. Michael Jackson. This was the Arvizos vs. Jackson. And I am not going to stand around while an injustice was carried out, I am going to let whoever wants to listen that this family falsely accused Mr. Jackson of a crime. And now are trying to get on with their lives as if nothing happened. Their supporters can go ahead and seek revenge on Mr. Jackson, I don't care, what else can they do him? As I stated. My invitation stands, debunk the blog and I will reveal my identify. You called Mr. Jackson a pedophile, I want you to please present evidence of the sort, don't come around here claiming this is not about the truth, or who's telling the truth. If this is not about who's telling the truth, why did you call Mr. Jackson a pedophile? Because it's the easiest thing to do? Why not go and read every court document about this case and perhaps you will feel disgusted to share the earth with people like the Arvizos. Falsely accusing people of a crime is a big fuking deal in my world. Especially such crime. I feel about the Arvizos like you feel about Mr. Jackson. Ha!

4:32 PM

4:35 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

ha, well bestmjfan if mike was in florida, i think it's highly impossible that he can molest someone in los olivos...but in ur mind, that might be able to happen.

i guess uthink dd is credible, too!

that's y she lost her job w/ ctv ON MIKE'S BIRTHDAY.

this isn't about making anyone'slife miserable. this is about educating people on who they're dealing w/.

forget about making mike miserable and his talks, they wanted it, and they got caught in many lies. how many times can one woman and her family be held hostage and sexually asualted or her kids molested?

david arvizo
jc penny's
michael jackson

don't forget, wheezy actually let it slip that janet accused her father of abuse and holding her hostage as well.....

6:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

bestmjfan said "I think you're trying to ruin his life and I think people should know this."

Born into the Arvizo family ruined his life. When you're an 8 year old stealing from department stores, falsely accusing your mother of abuse, lying, conning, cussing, fighting, you have no life, no future. Gavin and his family should have become better people after he was diagnosed with cancer, but, instead, they became greedier, using the illness to manipulate people, and further their conning ways. That's despicable.

6:27 PM  
Blogger Weezy said...

I have to just step in here and say, I never "slipped" and revealed that Janet had accused her father of abuse and holding her hostage. I do remember being asked that question but my reply was that I knew nothing about that. Janet had never and has never said that to me.

6:39 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I am ready to debate, let's fight with facts.

6:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Weezy, if you truly cared about the Arvizos, as much as you claim to, you would have done everything in your power to ensure they were safe, even if that meant allowing them to go to your house. But you didn't even call the police. And you didn't follow up Janet's phone call, to see how the Arvizos were. It seems to me that Gavin having had cancer affected you, as it would any decent individual, as it did Michael Jackson, but that does not make Gavin, or his family, honest. He and his family should have used his illness as a lesson to better their lives, but they did not. They conned you out of $20,000, and you refuse to acknowledge that they did wrong.

7:01 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

oh babe, nice try. i was in the courtroom during ur testimony. u said something to the effect 'she also told me her father abused her' or something like that and the state objected and it was sustained b/c it went out of the scope.

the jury loved ur "im a commedienne" comments when asked about y u said JANET WAS BIPOLAR AND MASADA WAS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

u looked stupid and i bet u loved that the state didn't tell u that u were taped until the day before ur testimony! ha ha

didn't get enuf time to prepare an answer or defense to ur TAPED comments?

i invite a debate, my dear. hopefully u'll be better online than u were in court!

7:03 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Wheezy had too good of a heart, so did many who were conned by this family. It's creepy simply because Michael Jackson was the accused, some folks turned a blind eye to certain information that points to Michael Jackson's innocence. I wonder if this were Jay Leno accused by this family how would certain people have reacted? It wasn't though, it was Arthur “Boo” Radley on the defendant chair.

7:08 PM  
Blogger truthis said...

Hey look if you are not sure about what you said we have the court transcripts just for you. Oh and make sure you read the parts where you said bad things about Janet and Jamie. And, after you do all of that come back and tell us why you didn't call the cops when Janet called you saying she was being held against her will.

7:08 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

hey, didn't ur buddies tell u to make the family stop calling? seems like mike wasn't the only one they wanted to hit up for cash.

he was the only one who didn't see their schemes.

unfortunately, u're just like him...wait, they'll get u too. just like they did to dave and penny's

7:12 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

What did the Arvizos do with all the playstations they received?....that's what I want to know. Did they donate any of them to ill or needy children?....I doubt it. They're too greedy!!

7:21 PM  
Blogger LIARvizo said...

BestMJFan @ if this is really about being an adult going after and child (and his crazy family) don't bother we ain't losing our sleep over this!!!!!

Actually it makes me feel pretty good!!!!

They can rot in hell for all I care!!!


I used to be a HUGE MJ fan but I'm old enough to see that there is not a perfect human being on this planet, and I'm smart enough to believe that MJ is human and not a god. I'm mad at MJ because he told the world that he was pure, loving, wouldn't hurt a child. He told us many things that weren't true and I think you're smart enough to know this. When I saw him for what he really is, I got angry because he betrayed us. When the day comes that you finally see the truth, you're going to be a lot madder than I am.


Telling us to get a life????

The thing is either Gavin, Janet, Star, Daveline or Jay lied on the stand cause they couldn't get their facts straight!!

As for Wheezy "I exagerate cause I'm a -failed- comedian"...

7:24 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

nice to know U said u only LIED about jamie b/c u were mad at him at the time.

sounds like what the grifters did to mike. lied b/c he got rid of them.

homeboy knew what was up. he just kept them around long enuf to ensure protection.....thank the lord for cameras and signed affidavits and chaperones!

7:33 PM  
Blogger LIARvizo said...

Louise Plonker's testimony...

Direct exam

3 THE WITNESS: She started by saying,
4 “Wheezy, if you have caller I.D., this is not a safe
5 line. Don’t call me back here. They’re listening
6 to everything I say.”
7 Q. BY MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Did she go on to tell
8 you more.
9 A. She said, “These people are evil. They’re
10 keeping us.”
11 I would say, “Where are the children.”
12 “The children are with me.”
13 I said, “Are the children in school.”
14 She said, “No,” and that’s when she started
15 crying.
16 I said, “Can I come and see you.”
17 She said, “No.”
18 She wanted me to come and get them and meet
19 them at --
20 THE COURT: Just a moment. Now you’ve gone
21 beyond the proposed --

Objections and stuff...

14 Q. BY MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Were you concerned
15 after this phone call.
16 A. Yes, I was concerned enough to call my
17 lawyer immediately following the phone call.

Further down on direct

10 Q. Did you call anybody after this phone call.
11 A. Just my lawyer.
12 Q. Why did you call your lawyer.
13 A. I felt that they were being held against
14 their will.

Doens't that makes sense???

She was concerned so she calls a lawyer!!!!
What??? What dya mean the police??? She didn't have the number!

Cross Exam

6 Q. Did you know you were being tape-recorded in
7 this discussion.
8 A. No, I don’t think I did.
9 Q. Do you remember telling them that, “I know
10 that Janet’s unbalanced. I think she’s totally
11 bipolar”.
12 MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Improper
13 opinion.
14 THE WITNESS: Do I answer.
15 THE COURT: Overruled.
16 (To the witness.) I’m thinking.
17 (Laughter.)
18 THE COURT: You may answer.
19 THE WITNESS: I’m not a psychiatrist, but
20 she -- she’s very excitable.
21 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: But do you remember
22 telling the sheriffs the following: “I know that
23 Janet’s unbalanced. I think she’s totally bipolar.
24 Something -- the behavior from the children from the
25 family was so over the top all the time”. Do you
26 remember saying that.
27 A. Yes, I do.
28 Q. Okay. Do you remember telling the Santa 3063

1 Barbara sheriffs when you were talking about letters
2 you received from the Arvizos, “You don’t just get
3 one letter from them. You get five letters from
4 them. You don’t get one phone call. You get five
5 phone calls. A message from Janet on your answering
6 machine can last five minutes.’ She mimics types of
7 messages on the phone.”
8 You mimicked for the sheriffs her messages
9 on the machine. Do you remember that.
10 A. Yes, I do.
11 Q. Is that something you said.
12 A. Yes. I was exaggerating. I didn’t know I
13 was being taped.
14 Q. Do you remember telling the Santa Barbara
15 sheriffs, when you didn’t realize that you were
16 being recorded, “Janet would sell them at the
17 benefits, then sell them at the hospital, and David
18 was never at The Laugh Factory when the children
19 were coming”.

The Lairvizos are very honest aren't they???

17 Q. Okay. So you don’t think you told the
18 sheriffs, “Janet would sell them at the benefits,
19 then sell them at the hospital”.
20 A. No, I don’t.
21 Q. Okay. Do you remember telling them that
22 Janet was never at the hospital.
23 A. Yes, I do. I think it may have been
24 “seldom,” now that I’m thinking of how they would
25 have mistyped it. (yeah the sentence “Janet would SELDOM at the benefits, then sell them at the hospital” makes a lot of sense Wheezy you're officially busted).
26 Q. Do you remember being asked if Janet had
27 ever approached you for money in that phone
28 conversation -- excuse me, in that interview. 3066

1 A. Say it again. I was just thinking about my
2 last thought. I’m sorry.
3 Q. Okay. In that interview on January 7th,
4 2005, with the Santa Barbara sheriffs, do you
5 remember being asked if Janet had ever personally
6 approached you or asked you for money.
7 A. I told them she hadn’t.
8 Q. No, you have to answer my question, please.
9 A. Okay.
10 Q. Do you remember being asked that question.
11 A. Yes, I do.
12 Q. Do you remember responding, “It was always
13 David or it was the children being coached to ask me
14 for a laptop”.
15 A. I felt that Gavin had been coached to ask me
16 for a laptop.
17 Q. Did Gavin ask you for the laptop.
18 A. He would go like this (indicating), because
19 I had promised him one, so he was reminding me.
20 Q. So you were asked by the officer, “What do
21 you mean by coached.” Do you remember that.
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And you said, “being coached to tell me that
24 they hadn’t gotten any Christmas presents
25 (inaudible)”.
26 A. Star had told me that, yes.
27 Q. Did you believe Star when he told you they
28 hadn’t gotten any Christmas presents. 3067

1 A. I didn’t, really. I wasn’t sure. A lot of
2 people were giving them gifts at that time.
3 Q. Did you think Star was being coached.
4 A. I did.
5 Q. Okay. And how do you know a lot of people
6 were giving them gifts around the same time that
7 Star said, “We don’t have any Christmas presents”.
8 A. I don’t know. I just know that people
9 visited them, comedians visited them, and it was
10 Christmastime, so I felt that he -- they probably
11 would have gotten something.

MAsadaaaaaaaaaa now!!

4 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Well, but just not
5 recalling things doesn’t make you a pathological
6 liar, right.
7 A. I’m not in a place to really make that
8 diagnosis, so --
9 Q. Well, you told them, “I think Jamie’s a
10 pathological liar,” right.
11 A. I may have said those words.
12 Q. Would it refresh your recollection to look
13 at the transcript.
14 A. No, I may have said those words.
15 Q. I’m trying to find out if you did, okay.
16 A. I probably did. But I was exaggerating.
17 Q. Okay. You talked about Jamie Masada and
18 David, and you said that Jamie told you David wanted
19 to set up a committee to get more money, right.
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. And you said, with respect to Jamie and
22 David, “One of them is telling the truth. The truth
23 is somewhere in the middle,” right.
24 A. Yes, I did.
25 Q. And the officer said, “Who do you believe to
26 be the truth.” And your response was, “I think
27 Jamie is a pathological liar,” right.
28 A. Well, it’s difficult to say in that 3075

1 situation. I still don’t know the truth, so it’s
2 difficult to say.
3 Q. Well, let me ask you this, if you recall the
4 conversation. I know you didn’t know they were
5 recording you.
6 You could have responded, “I think David is
7 a pathological liar,” but you didn’t. You said,
8 “I think Jamie’s a pathological liar,” right.
9 A. Right.
10 Q. And then the officer said, “Jamie is.” And
11 you said, “Yes.”
12 Now, that’s not just hyperbole, is it.
13 A. Sometimes he confuses incidents.
14 Q. Do you remember after you said, “I think
15 Jamie is a pathological liar,” the officer said,
16 “Jamie is.” And you said, “Yes”. Do you remember
17 that.
18 A. Yes.

hahahaha anything else you wanna say BITCH!!!!

7:38 PM  
Anonymous Padme said...

Now, now, there is no reason to call Weezy a "bitch". You can imagine how embarassing it would be for her to admit that the Arvizo's used her and she still stands by them. She is just a very gullible person. Look at how Diane Dimond used her for publicity, kind of like MJ fans use her for publicity for the Blog!

8:12 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

Palanker thought that Star was coached when he claimed that he and his family hadn't gotten any Christmas gifts. She thought that Gavin was coached when he tried to get her to buy him a laptop. She thought that Janet is "unbalanced" and "totally bi-polar". She told the police that the Arvizos can be "as whacky as they want to be". She told the police that people were calling her complaining about the Arvizos. She told the police "these people are teaching their kids to lie". YET, she cannot see the Arvizos for the con-artists that they are??!! C'mon!!

8:19 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Palanker is very aware she was conned. I think Palanker may enjoy her connection to this case. It's funny how Zonen is all mushy with Palanker even though she is on tape trashing the Arvizos. It's obvious Palanker lied on the stand. I wonder if Zonen believes she didn't mean what she said to them on tape. Or does he believe she lied on the tape or lied on the the stand? Which was the truth?

9:35 PM  
Blogger Weezy said...

Messereau Lied in his opening statement. You lie all over this blog. I told the truth on the stand.


The Bitch Formerly Known as Louise Palanker

10:55 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Mez didn't lie, because indeed you were on tape making those accusations against the Arvizos, however, you didn't know you were taped. You were planning to lie, but those tapes fucked up your planes. You were caught red-handed. Tom Mez didn't record you trashing the Arvizos, it was the prosecution that did. So the prosecution fixed the tapes? lol

7:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Weezy, did you tell the WHOLE truth and nothing but the Truth as you were sworn to? Reading you testimony it sounds as if you tried very hard not to offend anyone rather than trying really hard to tell the truth and the whole truth.

I think the whole truth came in your interview with the police.

11:46 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

hey wezzy, how about a nice slap in the face to knock some sense into you and hopefully take away some of the ugly?

1:19 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

sweetheart, did u lie to the newpaper u and fritz spoke to about this family? u were disappointed that the family didn't mention their connections to the jackson empire?

b/c, like u admitted UNDER OATH, u spoke ill of jaimie ONLY B/C U WERE UPSET W/ HIM.

there are no lies on this blog. only the honest truth in black and white. they're called TRANSCRIPTS.

or did u not know the stenographer was typing what u said VERBATIM?

b/c u seem to lie when u think ur not being taped or others can listen or read back what u said.

as for the person u called u a bitch, let me apologize for them. we want no animosity from anyone reading this blog.

it's simply here to educate and inform.

honestly, love, i think you're being scammed and i hope u find out before u shell out anymore money.....OOPS, ur paying for janut's council aren't u? damn, too late!

2:33 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

speaking of opening statements, didn't sneddon say he'd prove the family was held against their will?



if i can recall correctly,she PLED THE FIFTH!

seh won't take responsibility now just like she didn't w/ UR MONEY BEING ILL SPENT, and her conduct surrounding mike's case.

b/c we're all the master maths of choreography and we're gonna get her, right?

do u think a call to kaiser would benefit her, right now? u know, INSURANCE FRAUD?

seeing as how KAISER, MICHAEL JACKSON, AND THE LARCENY FACTORY were all either paying for or raisingmoney for gavin's medical bills.....u know, the ones kaiser paid for in full?

funny how pathalogical liar masada went from saying he raised thousands for their med bills to hundreds for the family when he knew he was in trouble.

didn't dave guest get in trouble for that recently? using a corporation and a public fundraiser but not disclosing how much was raised. wasn't that y all of jamie's records were sub.?

don't try to downtalk us like u did w/ the jury. we got the truth and nothing but FACTS on our side!

2:38 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

If T-mez is a liar, then i'm ruler of the universe.

3:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This blog is only here to educate people about the actual trial. Even today the likes of DD are trying to make the Arvizo family sound credible when they were obviously not. The prosecutor had to change the timeline because the intial timeline was illogical and even with the changes the case was still illogical. It shouldn't have gone to trial but it did because it was Michael Jackson, the "Wacko" "freak" and all the other names he was called, people just assumed that he would be found "guilty" no matter how ludicrous the story. But the Jury actually examine the evidence as oppose to listening to court TV..and came to the right judgement.

3:10 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

"Weezy" loves (cough, cough) the Arvizos, but she won't call the police on their behalf, she won't let them go to her house, she won't call them back to find out if they're okay, she thinks they're all whacky and the children were coached, she thinks they're over the top, she thinks Janet needs to see a psychiatrist and is "unstable and totally bipolar", and she said one thing to the police, and another on the stand. What a joke.

ONE S in Mesereau, NOT two. Spell it properly, duped woman.

4:06 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

it's just like geraldo rivera said
"if the defendant's name had been Jackson Michael, nobody would have cared" but the reason people are so interested is because it's michael jackson. they are not fans so they don't care about the case and even less about justice. it's none of their business really but the haters just wanna keep the wacko jacko reputation going.

4:30 PM  
Blogger KC said...

From Weezy Plonker's description of the Arvizo's on the transcript, one would think she would have stopped associating with them. But here she is, going out of her way to defend the bipolar, the pathological liar, and the child actors. I wonder what has made her turn around and support the con-artists and their lies...hmmm...

4:32 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

i wonder too

5:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Weezy is either brainless, brainwashed, or she's afraid of something and pretends to like the Arvizos; maybe Janut got to her with stories of Mexican Mafia connections. Or maybe Weezy knows what's really going on at the Laugh Factory.

6:56 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

not only was the timeline illogical, but the first two didn't apply.

remember, we're dealing w/ three.

the first came courtesy of kim newsome on ctv....the initial date on the complaint, according to her, was from june to nov of '03.

see that wouldn't work b/c 27 MILLION PEOPLE saw and heard that boy defend mike.

cue into the second which was moved solely b/c the ONLY BIT OF EXCULPATORY evidence presented in the grand jury was the dcfs memo which landed splat in the middle of their accusations. like janet said, mike's people were there 'PER MY REQUEST' that woulda been the best time to cry for help. when they were put out of the apartment.

cue in to the last one where it was proven mike was never alone w/ the child. so unless u're planning to accuse frank cascio of fascilitating molestation, i'd shut up.

IMO, wheezy is just afraid to ditch them. im sure she doesn't have the entourage mike has so she can't rely on having a third party around EVERY TIME SHE DELT W/ THEM

if they were coached to lie to her, they admitted to lying on their affidavits w/ penny's, and they lied about their father....

if it walks like a liar
and it talks like a liar
it's a damn arvizo!

7:17 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I meant "fucked up your plans" on the last post.

8:13 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

B/C lawd knows, when u mention planes to this family, it means assaulting a sleeping doctor w/ hot mashed potatoes and insulting the stewards....

10:34 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

Sneezy W(h)eezy, who refuses to answer any questions which prove that the Arvizos are liars and con-artists, and refuses to acknowledge and respond to any of the comments which prove that she is a liar, is as pathetic as the Arvizos.

Sneezy W(h)eezy, can I have $20,000?....I promise to spend it on items I don't need.

3:14 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

yeah i have bronchitis but even though my dad's a marine and we have full medical, i think i'm gonna need some candles, a tv, and a new bike.

please, wheezy? what about a computer? im not gonna get anything for xmas.....

5:10 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

5:19 PM  
Anonymous CaliJew/Cath said...

sheesh weezy... Your giving jews a bad name.

10:51 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...


6:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A short list of Wacko lies:

1. He said he would never live at Neverland again.
2. He told Ed Bradley that his CD was number one around the world except in the US. Diane Dimond disproved that. (No wonder the Jacko defenders hate her!)
3. He told Diane Sawyer that he never paid off anyone. Mes said otherwise, admitting at least two.
4. He told Diane Sawyer that he didn't have any nasty photos or books picturing boys, "...unless someone sent something I haven't opened," but Sneddon said he lied. LE found a lewd, commercially published hardcover book of black-and-white photos of nude boys aged about 7 to 12 "at play," and a book that is often found in the home of pedophiles. There was also a picture of a nude little boy--scantily draped with a sheet--found in Jackson's bedroom--actually, more than one.
5. He said the police hurt him at his arrest. The AG said otherwise.
6. He said the handcuffs caused a bruise halfway up his forearm. Impossible.
7. He gave two versions of Blanket's maternity. One has to be a lie.
8. He claimed he is the biological father of his kids and that they were conceived the natural way. Chuckle, no way. The kids are proof.
9. He claimed that his purchased kids were born in the community of Santa Maria. None were.
10. He has claimed in the past not to drink and his employees at Neverland have stated there is no liquor served at Neverland.
11. He lied about giving the oxygen chamber story to the media.
12. He claimed LE searched in areas of his property not covered by search warrants.
13. He said former employees from 1993 were "disgruntled" but they were actually fired after cooperating with LE.
14. He claimed that the photos of his genitals didn't match Jordie's description. But we all know better since we have an NBC interview with Bill Dworin:
Dworin: "We had served a search warrant to photograph Michael Jackson. Those photographs corroborated the description that the boy gave us regarding Michael Jackson's genitals."
Mankiewicz: "The boy was able to describe discolorations of Jackson's skin?"
Dworin: "Yes."
Mankiewicz: "On his genitals, accurately?"
Dworin: "Very much so."
15. He claimed the Guinness book makes him the king of charity work, and yet, Guinness says all he has is the longest list of different charities, not the most money donated.
16. He claims to care so much about the charitable work but most of the charities he has been involved with have fallen apart and no longer exist. When he had to list verifiable charitable works for his bond reduction motion, he listed individual teddy bears and two signed napkins.
17. He supplied the court with a sworn statement admitting four different plastic surgery procedures on his nose and the creation of a chin cleft. He made no mention of surgery on his lips, cheeks or eyes. Libel claim was rejected pending medical proof.
18. He told Bashir many lies about plastic surgery:
~~That he only had two facial surgeries, total.
~~That the cleft in his chin just happened naturally. Please!
~~That he never had a chin implant. His momma says he did.
19. He even lied about the color of his father's eyes which are light brown or brown/green. MJ said he has blue eyes.

11:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We already know your identity, ReQ. You don't have to tell us.

11:52 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

sure he's told lies before. so have you. who the hell hasn't? but are his lies anywhere near as serious as the ones the arvizos have told? i don't think so.

1:09 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

did he lie and say someone molested him when they didn't?

dworkin's comments are disproved by an article posted in the NYP that siad the description did not match.

the police did NOT have access to mike's office but told ranch manager joe marcus they just needed to search to see if there were people in the office.

then they said they'd call the judge to amend the warrant, they never did.

if you've ever seen his sons' eyes, you'd know they're his kids.

the fab five that were fired were fired b/c of lack of duty. they weren't doing their jobs.

don't u find it funny they'd love to work for a pedo? especially when they claimed to see him molest kids and yet, did nothing?

technically, mike paid no one. if u read the motions, u'd know that his insurance paid both claims. both against his will. if u knew anything about insurance, u'd know that 'negligence' is the key word and they'll almost always payout.

it came out of homeowner's insurance, not mike's pocket.

the attny general said mike had to cooperate but mike couldn't b/c of the gag order so he could only comply if he filed a complaint. the investigation was totally one-sided.

he said nevvy was no longer his home that he'd be comfortable. its just a home ot him.

u think he'd buy another house just to go to court? just keep that one and stay there till it's over.

is he there now?

he said his kids were raised in this community. and he loved that community. he's been there damn near 18 yrs. where's the lie there?

as for dd's veracity. the woman tries to analyze legal documents when she BARELY graduated hs and never attended college. the only legal words she knows are 'settlement' 'redacted' and '1108'

4:21 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

you tell em'

4:39 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

in fact, not only is dd widly uneducated, she said some things that could get her wonderful man in trouble.

she was tipped off in june 03 about this case....funnyb/c gavin'smommy said she didn't know about anything until SEPT!

also, she knew when the warrants would be executed. now, when talking about the search she says "we found this where theboy said it would be" "we found that..."

WE? were WE in the house or on property during the search?

y did ts get so nervous when joe marcus said at the pretrial hearings that there was a camera on in mike's bedroom during the search and that it was ON?

y did ts put his arm around mez and say he didn't need to call more cops? afraid of something?

7:58 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Blog Top Sites