Sunday, January 01, 2006

The penis that knew too little...

In 1993, many people in the media rejoiced the possibility of Michael Jackson going to prison based on a drawing of a "penis" made by Evan Chandler allegedly described by his son Jordan Chandler. For a decade many people have thrown that idea of a description as proof Michael Jackson molested Jordan Chandler. In fact, many in the media have the balls to proclaim the drawing was a 100% match. However, I am not sure even a man looking at his own penis, and drawing it can have a 100% match, but that’s the logic of certain people in the media. Any logic that promotes the lie they’ve been promoting for 10 years that Michael Jackson is guilty of molestation. And I want to give my readers a scenario: Let’s pretend the drawing was 100% a match, Evan Chandler still sued Michael Jackson and refused to go to a criminal trial. Wouldn’t you as a parent be rejoiced to have such concrete proof to put the person that harmed your child in prison? Well, I guess The Chandler$ are different kind of parent$. I would like any male who believes Michael Jackson is guilty based on a drawing to draw their own private parts without looking at it and then tell me if it is a PERFECT MATCH. I also want to present my readers the actual drawing released by the Smoking Gun and the Drudge Report Websites:

Here we go folks:





As you can see above, this is the drawing many people have been throwing in our faces to make us believe this drawing classified as a perfect match of Michael Jackson’s penis. Well, draw your own conclusions by looking at it. I also want to point out it was Evan Chandler who made the drawing allegedly with the direction of his son Jordan Chandler (who divorced his parents in the mid-90s) I also want you guys to notice the last name Orietta on the document. The name belongs to a Michael Jackson ex-employee Orietta Murdoch who sold her stories to various tabloids. And this woman also helped Evan Chandler with the supposed description of the penis and butt who according to many smartasses in the media was a PERFECT MATCH. I also want to add the fact this description of the penis (looks more like a mushroom to me) describes a penis that is circumcised, I do not know if Jackson is circumcised, however, I do know he was born into a Jehovah Witness family, so the chances of Jackson been circumcised as a child decreased. However, maybe Evan who was or still is a Jew assumed all males were circumcised, because he himself was. Take it as you'd like.

36 Comments:

Blogger HIStory94 said...

Very to the point. SO sterotypical of Chandler who really is a jew. Guess he is ashamed of his heritage as well being that he changed his last name! Anyway, being a Witness myself we do not go by Mosiac Law! So the drawing is so out of the question! Then an ex employee helping that idiot try to scam money out of Michael? How low would those leeches go?

7:33 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

wow, isn't that the most accurate drawing of a penis you've ever seen...(sarcasm)

8:28 AM  
Blogger Skywriter said...

Poor Evan Chandler. Deformed and he doesn't even know it, going around assuming that every man's penis looks like that.

8:58 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

at least his does.

9:52 AM  
Blogger KC said...

What happened was Evan looked at his own odd little dick, drew it, added vitiligo symptoms, and voila! we get a stick house with unintelligible ramblings around it.

10:05 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

or maybe it's tom sneddon's penis. or diane diamond's.

11:12 AM  
Blogger HIStory94 said...

It has to be Sneddon's short comings!

11:23 AM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

You noticed how Evan wrote "his theory" on the top box on the document...lol

11:34 AM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

Wow, if I hadn't begun posting here, you'd run out of topics to address.

LOL

11:40 AM  
Blogger Skywriter said...

That doesn't make any sense. These are things we knew about and have had detailed knowledge about for years. It's not like any extensive research has to be done once you address a topic. It's all in the public domain, just never reported in the mainstream press.

11:56 AM  
Blogger invincible said...

Evan Chandler is so pathetic....useless at art, useless at dentistry, a useless writer, a useless father, a useless husband, a useless friend, and an overall useless loser.

12:03 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

Gavin!!.... I mean Anton, i wish you could have drawn that well!

12:27 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

Evan Chandler is so pathetic....useless at art, useless at dentistry, a useless writer, a useless father, a useless husband, a useless friend, and an overall useless loser.
___________________________________

Ummmm excuse me, Both Evan AND his Brother Ray were inspirational to me and instrumental in me making the decision to go ahead and scam the pants off Daddy Michael

12:31 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I will address any nonsense coming to me, hon. If you didn't want it to be address why bring it up? lol I am not afraid of any topic. Once again, you're not hurting the website by coming here, you're helping it. lol So with arms wide open, I'll welcome you.

2:27 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Mom,

You copied your own SCAMS! stop blaming Evan! lol

2:28 PM  
Blogger invincible said...

Janet, is that all you think of, Michael Jackson's pants? You know he wasn't spying on you with his telescope, and wouldn't want to spy on you with his telescope, right? Yuk!

2:35 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

Invincible - I had my heart set on being a Jackson. I had a spare part - Jay - ready should Michael have rejected me. I was so certain Michael and I were gonna hit it off, i mean he did dance with me in the cinema at his home. *Sigh* It was not to be was it... No oh no but I tried to get him back for rejecting me, I mean... I went out and got a leg wax... or was that a body wax? I cant remember, anyway I went out and got all that (on his credit card while being held hostage) to look pretty for him, but he didnt want me! Why? My Ex husband's brother was part of the mexican mafia shouldn't that have been a big enough threat to him?

Anton - You know I copied Evan's case word for word almost to the letter, give the guy a little credit for helping us down the line of being able to claim victim support money.

4:32 PM  
Blogger LIARvizo said...

Jordan and I have something in comon... we like the Smurfs!!

9:38 AM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

yey, smurfs!

12:21 PM  
Blogger maryanne said...

Anton,
I read the Chandler docs over at the SG. Thanks for the Chandler entry here, it really starts to put things in focus. I have questions about the drawing: Who made this drawing public? The name 'Orietta' (I might have it spelled wrong) appears in two places. If Evan was making notes on this drawing, what's the context of her name being there? Could it be that he heard from her that MJ uses bleaching cream? Has someone said that and maybe I missed it? The right hand side of drawing has words in a box. I can't make out the words except for her name again. What do the other words say? Thanx!

1:42 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Orietta Murdoch was an ex-employee who worked as an assistant for MJJproductions. Also, in the same drawing Evan writes that Brett Barnes who testified at the trial and said mj never molested him was molested. The stories about Brett and Wade been molested came from Orietta and that same story ended up in Jordan's story. And the drawing was made public by Victor Gutierrez in his book "MJ was my lover..." banned in the United States for promoting sex with minors. In the book Victor says Evan Chandler and some of the ex-employees provided him with all those documents and supposely Jordan's "diary..." lol This case was a set up for the start. In fact, Jordan Chandler divorced his parents in the mid 90s and has not spoken to them since. I know Jordan went to school in the east coast. Michael's lawyer Thomas said during a speech at Harvard that if Jordan Chandler decided to come and testified against MJ. He had witnesses ready to say Jordan had told them his case was a set up and his parents forced him to say MJ molested him. If people look deeper at MJ's case, they would totally be shocked at all the information that's not published. This case was nothing but HISTERIA.

4:30 PM  
Blogger maryanne said...

Thanks for answering my questions. June Chandler testified at the trial, right? Did you find her testimony to be credible? Was there amything you thought she was lying about? Do you think her testimony was damaging? Did Mr. Mesereau confront her about having put her son up to lying about MJ? Do you think June Chandler had a crush on Michael or was she in love with his money?

6:36 PM  
Blogger maryanne said...

Michael was friends with Brett and Wade before Jordan?

6:39 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Her testimony really wasn't a big deal, I do not think it harmed MJ. I think it harmed her because she talked about all the "suspicious" she had about MJ, however, kept inviting MJ into her home. Also, Thomas confronted her about something she said about Michael crying when he told her he couldn't spend time with Jordan (even tho she went on vacation with MJ many times after that...)Thomas asked her if MJ was upset after she told him she wasn't able to trust another man because the other men in her life failed her. However, in the trial she testified he cried about Jordan, and Thomas confronted her and said...he was upset ABOUT YOU, not your son. Also he pointed out she hasn't talked to Jordan in 10 years, he also pointed out she spent a lot of her money from the settlement on a 700,000 dollar house. In fact, that was the 1st thing she did when the case was settled. It just seemed like she wasn't too concerned for her son back in the day, however, in court she acted as if she cared. Either way she looked like a bad mother, because if we were to believe HER then she sold her son for a million dollars. You feel me? That's the amount she got on the setttlement, which is odd, both parents got a million dollars UPFRONT. And signed a document in which Michael Jackson DENIES ever doing anything to their son. Another thing that caught my eye was the fact she was trying to make Jordan responsible for the lawsuit, she said it was all Jordan's decision to SUE Michael. You should read her testimony, we have it on the list as well.

8:02 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

June was like saying Jordan wanted the money. lol And yes, Michael was friends with Mac, Wade, and Brett. Those were the group of kids that belong to families he had over at the ranch. Many of the girls in the families and even some of the mothers talked about sleeping in Michael's room. It seemed like sleeping there wasn't such a big deal. So I think one can see how that could be misunderstood. One of the mothers testified about her family and the Chandlers being at neverland at the same time. She said June Chandler acted as if she owned Neverland, she would send the staff around. Also, in court it was revealed June Chandler asked Michael for 5 million dollars to eliminate her family's debt. Also, a maid testify to finding June Chandler doing lundry in MJ's room, as if she has slept there. In court she tried to distance herself from Michael, but it didn't work because witnesses said she acted as if she was married to him. Another witness said Michael tried to avoid June and Jordan at times because they were getting too comfortable. IMO Michael started to distance himself from the Chandlers when Evan Chandler started talking about movie deals and June Chandler asked for 5 million dollars to pay debts. I think that's when the shit started.

8:11 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

I also advise you to read the completed phone conversation between Evan Chandler and David S (who was married to June at the time) This conversation was recorded by David. David was one of the people who informed Michael's camp about Evan's plan of extortion. So he recorded Evan's conversation with him. The conversation is very long and can be found somewhere on the net, I read it. And honestly, is the oddest THING I'VE READ. Evan Chandler was very angry about Michael Jackson ignoring him and not listening to him. All he wanted was Michael to sit down and listen to him. Also at one point David asked Evan if he thinks Michael is fucking Jordan and Evan says he doesn't know. Most of the conversation is Evan complaining about Michael ignoring him, at times he trashes his own son. I mean this man was NUTS. LOL

8:16 PM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

Wow, a new year and you're still obsessed with a teenage boy, and now you have penis drawings.

You know, this blog does contain great satire; I can appreciate your stance on the matter and Janet Arvizo-Jackson is pretty much a dullard. But you should probably leave the minors out of it...something Wacko Jacko should've done a looong time ago.

Just a thought. I'm gone.

12:27 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

if u weren't as dense as u are, u'd understand that this site isn't just about picking on gavin/anton or star/daniel

it's about the whole GRIFTER family

3:38 PM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

"losal23 said...
if u weren't as dense as u are, u'd understand that this site isn't just about picking on gavin/anton or star/daniel

it's about the whole GRIFTER family"
-----------------------------------

Oh really? Well, I guess I was misled somewhat by the blog's TITLE:

"Los Alamitos High School's Anton Jackson"

But honestly, don't you think it's odd that some adult (I'm assuming) is (ironically) obsessed over a teenage boy enough to start a blog about him (oh yeah, and "the whole GRIFTER family") a full 5 months after the verdict was delivered?

Treat that as a rhetorical question if you wish...

8:14 PM  
Blogger Anti-Jacko Crowd said...

Just a little more about the target---I mean, "subject" of the blog:

-----------------------------------
Los Alamitos High School's Anton Jackson
Anton Jackson the (con) artist formerly known as Gavin Arvizo! Disclaimer: This is not Gavin Arvizo, however, the information presented on this site about the Michael Jackson case is 100% factual. The transcripts, and the pictures are factual. The information is only presented in a satirical humorous form for comic relief.
-----------------------------------

Now, while I appreciate good satire as much as anyone else, and have even said I think this is good satire, if this is really about the "whole GRIFTER family," then the blurb at the top of the page should reflect that, shouldn't it?

After all, the blog's author had 5 whole months following the verdict to think it over...

8:18 PM  
Blogger Karyn'splace said...

Well, no one really cares about what you think and no one is forcing you to stay here. So don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out

7:26 AM  
Blogger Haku said...

In January 1994, USA Today printed an article confirming that, "photos of Michael Jackson's genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct." Some tabloid reports may indicate otherwise but keep in mind that the District Attorney brought his "evidence" in front of two grand juries and charges were not filed. If the photos matched the boy's description, the case would have probably gone to trial.

and Michael was NOT circumcised.

8:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jackson was NOT circumcised. No re-connective surgery to hide prior circumcision. Autopsy rules that out. Before he was a J.W. Jackson was a Black male born in the fifties. It was not so usual to be circumcised then.

No DNA evidence from the 60 or so raids done on any dwelling Jackson inhabited. All this sex going on at the Chandler home and the Mom, Step-Father and Father when he shows up, never….ever sees or smells the obvious signs of sexual activity. The claims that the boy was given new underwear to go home in after sex at Jackson’s house was the dumbest imaginable. Mom was the maid in her house; she did the laundry and did not see all those new tightie whities, the semen stains inside/outside the pants or linen?

Best of all if there had been any child pornography, any shred of evidence of sexual misconduct from one state to another or one country to another the FBI would have charged Jackson. Taken over the case and charged him themselves. Those are Federal Offenses.

12:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are brilliant. Michael was not circucised, you are right. The decription that the father,not the boy made, was not a match AT ALL. THEY WANTED MONEY AND THEY GOT THEM.

3:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are brilliant. Michael was not circucised, you are right. The decription that the father,not the boy made, was not a match AT ALL. THEY WANTED MONEY AND THEY GOT THEM.

3:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Right, condemn the kids and call them ALL liars. Just another vast conspiracy against a beloved celebrity who couldn't possibly be nothing but an angel. Hope none of you or your children were or are never molested. They'd have a hard time being believed over trivial stuff.
I suppose Jerry Sandusky was really the chaplain at Penn State and all 34 of his accusers are the devil on a mission to ruin his past career???

2:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Humor 
Blog Top Sites