Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Sucking for her life...





Angel was a cook at Neverland, he was also Davellin Arvizo's boyfriend.




In court it was revealed that Davellin Arvizo spent a lot of her time at Neverland with a young cook named Angel. However, when Davellin talked to the police, she never mentioned Angel or her relationship with him, why? Well, Davellin and her family told the police the family was held against their will at Neverland, Davellin told the police she was always left alone at Neverland because she was a girl. When in fact, Angel testified, Davellin spent a lot of her time with him; in fact it was revealed in court documents that they had a sexual relationship. However, on the stand she said she had never met Angel. So, when the family was held against their will at Neverland they were allowed sexual favors from cooks? I guess I am just trying to make sense of what is like to be kidnapped in a place like Neverland. A place where you're kidnapped and allowed to go shopping, attend odontologist's appointments (yes, one of the Arvizo kids had braces, I believe it was Anton himself) and go back to their house and come back over and over again. It must have been terrible for them. Sadly for them Michael Jackson wasn't around, yes, that's why the molestation dates were changed three times, right Anton? Because you guys (along with Sneddon) realized Michael wasn't around. So the dates had to be changed (more on the fact the molestation dates were changed three times later on this week) Sometimes I wonder while Davellin was kidnapped and Angel was with her, did she think Angel's penis was a phone with a direct line to 911? Perhaps. Who knows!



PS. Also, it was revealed Davellin Arvizo called Angel and said her mother and Jay Jackson are planning to do something "crazy" against Mr. Jackson. Davellin also told Angel her mother was crazy and that they were going to own Neverland...

21 Comments:

Blogger Unbreakable J said...

you know, I've always wondered if that baby was Angel's and Davellin's and not JanUt's

11:55 AM  
Blogger LIARvizo said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

5:05 PM  
Blogger LIARvizo said...

yup, and I think you're not the only one who's wondering... Remember that motion Oxman submitted where he wanted all of Janet's and her alleged newborn's medical records subpoened...

Some ppl even started thinking that David may have had some fun with Daveline!!!!

If you look at the picture you'll notice Daveline is pulling the strawler with the baby inside...

5:06 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

David had no access to Davellin...so that theory is not correct.

6:10 PM  
Blogger maryanne said...

I've really enjoyed coming to your blog and reading the transcripts you've posted. The background info that you've shared helps put things into perspective. I think your blog has a lot of potential. Sounds like you're getting a lot of traffic. You have a huge opportunity to educate a lot of people about the Jackson trial and the injustice of it all. I work in public relations and I hope you won't mind a little constructive criticism. I'm not making a personal judgement here. Whatever you put in the blog is cool with me because it's free speech. What I see is that you want the truth to be known. To who? The fans already know Mr. Jackson is innocent. Do you want to educate the casual fans and the non-fans? If the answer is 'yes' then please consider what I have to say.

Your blog is sending mixed messages. On one hand you have the transcripts and the comments discussing the testimony and, on the other hand, you have this very emotional, hate filled trashing of the real Anton Jackson. It confuses people who are looking to learn about the trial. It diverts attention away from your main purpose (which is to educate). I had five of my co-workers read the blog and almost all of them said the same thing. They saw what they felt was a lot of fan emotion so they dismissed everything else without reading it (which is what I first did). None of them had a solid opinion on the verdict before reading the blog. Now they're even more confused.

Do you get what I'm saying? I've researched the net. There is nothing else out there with the same potential. You might want to put your emotion and hatred aside for the greater good of helping Mr. Jackson. Get all your info together and start at the beginning and tell your story. Identify your target customer and sell it to them. I think you have what it takes to turn this blog into something very important. Think very carefully how you want to grow it from this point. I think it could end up being big. Good luck to you. If I can help in anyway, just leave me a note here. I'll be checking back :)

7:06 PM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

5:54 AM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

5:56 AM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

5:57 AM  
Blogger Anton Jackson said...

Also, the blog was really a form of humor for the fans. The fans that always get belittle for being fans as if their opinion does not matter. When is more valid and informed than ANY OTHER OPINION! LOL the fans can tell you EVERY PERSON EVER INVOLDED in this case with birthdays and all!! lol I do not want to take away the fan aspect of it, you feel me? However, I do agree with organizing the facts more. Many fans hate The Arvizos, but MANY DO NOT that includes ME, people like that I PITY. I do not hate any living being on earth. I am however disgusted by them. What may look like hatred to you or anybody is simply FACTS, they actually did those things, so I can't sugar coated.We've never lied about The Arvizos on this blog believe it or not. I can't make the truth be nice because is not. I also didn't do this blog to help Michael Jackson, that's another misunderstanding that I believe I should clarify. It wasn't to help him or hurt him. The blog was born out of Diane Dimond's lies and her constant throwing in people's faces how victimized these people are, when they're really not. It felt right onto my hands when someone posted actual pictures of the current life these folks were living. And then boom a link to Gavin's own my space blog FELT INTO MY HANDS. And the rest is history. If I am educating people with the blog, good, if I am not, it's ok as well. The blog will have some type of emotion, in this case is HUMOR. That's it, I am presenting factual information with humor. If some people believe fans are idiots and have no valid opinions that's their biz, however, fans didn't write the court transcripts. And most of the information comes from those transcripts, so the emotion they're reading could simply be the truth.

6:04 AM  
Blogger gilesmic said...

maryanne, if you want facts in a non-satirical format you should check out http://www.casefact.com

12:57 PM  
Blogger gilesmic said...

For those interested, the court motions relevant to this update of the blog can be found here:

This motion talks about the statements Davellin made about her family, etc.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/051705mjrespvivanco.pdf

and
This motion talks about Davellin's and Angel's "quasi-sexual" relationship
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/051005pltmotexclsex.pdf

1:32 PM  
Blogger LIARvizo said...

David had no access to Davellin...so that theory is not correct.

************

My bad I mean Jay!!!!

1:48 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

Awwwww look at that pretty picture of My daughter and her son... whoops i mean my son....

5:50 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

That boy, lets call him 'Jet' - (i've heard more than 10 times they called him Michael hense Anton's hestitation to name him on the stand) - is gonna have such a fab upbringing in my house hold with all the scams, he will never go hungry

5:52 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

9:18 PM  
Blogger Janet Ventura Arvizo Jackson said...

My daughter has such lovely butterfly baby blue leggins, the fabric is so busy, we were surprised we could get so much of it!!!

She's finding them a little uncomfortable because those JC Pennys security tags really dig into the flesh when you sit down.

9:21 PM  
Blogger pyt in nyc said...

i find it interesting davellin didn't say angel molested her.

1:03 PM  
Blogger losal23 said...

so im confused. i thought his legal name was jett jay jackson...

what is it?

3:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Davellin has no children, even though she has been happily married for a bit.

The boy in the stroller is Jet, who is the child of Janet.

And you people, stop posing to be my friends. It's offensive.

The father David DID have access to Davellin. He only cared for Davellin and Gavin and still tries to contact Davellin to this day. Because of David Arvizo, his lying family, and this case, the Arvizo family's life is ruined. They are constantly being scrutinized for something people can get over. Get over it already. It happened years ago.

4:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous above is really stupid

Michael Jackson is scrutinized for something he had nothing to do with until this day. He was the victim.
why don't you tell haters to give him a break and get a life to stop trashing an innocent man?

protecting horrible liars? they wasted your tax money, moron.

9:29 AM  
Blogger Malcy said...

I really enjoyed reading your saritical remarks and the digs at the Queen of Trash DD. Keep up the good work!

9:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Humor 
Blog Top Sites